Researchers’ views on Science Communication and Open Science

Last week Vetenskap & Allmänhet (Public & Science), a Swedish non-profit acting to promote dialogue and openness between researchers and the public, released an interesting report together with Vetenskapsrådet. The report deals with Researchers’ views on Science Communication and Open Science, and is the result of comprehensive interviews with researchers, science communicators and research funders in Sweden.

Some of the results include:

  • science communication is seen as important, particularly for democratic reasons
  • the biggest obstacle is lack of time and the fact that it isn’t seen as a merit
  • researchers experience positive support from their colleagues when they do science communication outside of academia
  • researchers rarely use social media for science communication
  • open science is an unfamiliar term for many, who instead associate it with open access (of research publications)

The report and news post about it are currently only available in Swedish.

Public & Science news post about the report (Swedish)
Full text of the report (Swedish)

The results of the report were presented and discussed at a seminar at Vetenskapsrådet on March 23rd 2018. A recording of the seminar (held in Swedish) is available here:

Text: Signe Wulund

Perspectives on FAIR open research data

The Swedish National Data Service (SND) had meetings and workshops in Gothenburg in November 2017 on the topic of FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable & reusable) access to reasearch data. Find a summary of Day 1 & 2 here.  The third day was aimed at researchers, and the issues on the table were ones that are highly relevant to the scientific world, and have been much discussed elsewhere as well.

As many people probably know, research funders such as the EU have begun demanding Data Management Plans (DMP) as a part of grant applications or to receiving grant funding. The Swedish government has also set the target that all research data should – as far as possible – be made openly available within the next ten years.

With funders and governments actively working toward making research data FAIR, engaging with the open data process will eventually be required of all researchers. But the decision to champion open data has been made with the best interest of researchers and the public both in mind.

The advantages of making research data FAIR are obvious, and include:

  • Making it possible to reuse data in new studies
  • Making it possible to verify earlier research
  • Saves duplication of effort when data required has already been gathered and made accessible
  • Makes meta analyses and similar research easier to undertake and the subsequent results more robust
  • Makes data accessible for tax payers and other organisations who fund the research

The Swedish government’s proposition 2016/17:50 Kunskap i samverkan – för samhällets utmaningar och stärkt konkurrenskraft p. 107 (Swedish, pdf) also highlights the following:

Open access to research results contribute to maintaining and supporting high quality research. When results rapidly become available, research can progress more quickly by allowing more researchers to validate them and continue building on previous results. Research and development doesn’t only take place at higher education institutions, but also within industry, in small and middle sized companies, and in the public sector. By actively disseminating research results and making them openly accessible these stakeholders get to share in new breakthroughs in research sooner, which can contribute to new innovations, better ability to compete on the market, and a stronger public sector.

You could also ask – why not make research data openly accessible in a FAIR way, as it seems like it would have a positive impact on research in general?

A number of obstacles were mentioned both at the SND days and in other sources:

  • Practical issues – how to store data that can be counted in terabytes or even petabytes?
  • Lack of time – to describe data so that it can be reused by others is very time consuming
  • Confidentiality and personal information – open access sometimes collides with data protection acts such as the upcoming General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
  • Discomfort – putting data out there might make researchers feel worried that it might be misused, or that other researchers might take advantage of it before the work of collecting and processing the data pays off

Naturally, there are many different ways in which to overcome these obstacles. SND is now getting funding from the Swedish Research Council to work with higher education institutions and improve the Swedish research infrastructure, which will be a huge help when it comes to practical storage issues. SND is also one of many organisations that can give help and advice for how to write a DMP and make data processing as easy as possible. As a part of this SND work, higher education institutions like Borås University will have local expert groups (Data Access Units, DAU) available to help researchers. As with everything else the process of making data FAIR will probably go easier and quicker if done a little at a time from the start rather than as one big project to be sorted out after the fact.

When it comes to the risk of losing something by making research data openly accessible experts like Gustav Nilsonne (Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University) claim that this has not happened to date. If your data is available and is used by someone who publishes what you feel are dubious results there are academic channels through which you can contest those results – and then Nilsonne says that it is better to simply have made the data accessible rather than collaborated with someone who publishes sub-par work. And if some other researcher or research group should find results in your own data that you weren’t even aware of – well, isn’t that how research is supposed to work?

Last but not least, FAIR research data might be something that can help with the reproductibility crisis that many researchers think today’s science is facing. If the data supporting a research result is missing or unusable that means there’s no way to validate results that are being questioned.

As many participants at the SND days said: you shouldn’t have to reinvent the wheel with your research. So saving, standardizing and making data accessible might be seen like assembling a bicycle rather than leaving all of the parts of the bike lying around in a locked shed. Sure, it takes more work – but in the end the result is so much more useful!

Text: Signe Wulund

For more information about open access to research data at the University of Borås, see the Library’s Research Data web pages.

Sources (external links)

Biblioteken vid Lunds universitet: Varför öppna data? (Swedish)
Gustav Nilsonne: Öppna, slutna och dolda data (Swedish, lecture)
Gustav Nilsonne: Diskussion om behovet av öppen data (Swedish, lecture)
Nature 533, 452-454 (26 May 2016): 1,5000 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
Regeringens proposition 2016/17:60: Kunskap i samverkan – för samhällets utmaningar och stärkt konkurrenskraft (Swedish, pdf)
SND: Samarbeten ska ge individdata av hög kvalitet (Swedish)

SND Network Meeting and Forum

November 13th – 15th 2017 the Swedish National Data Service (SND) arranged three events in Gothenburg: a discussion with HEIs about the new joint infrastructure, a forum about FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data, and a workshop aimed at researchers.

The network meeting and forum covered a lot of topics, but it was clear that a very pressing issue was the need for a national infrastructure for storing research data. Therefore it was very good to hear that the Swedish Research Council is going to invest four billion SEK in Open Science and related activities over the next eight years. Exactly how much will go to the SND is still not known. However, VR have decided to allocate 1.2 billion SEK over five years to the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) who coordinate computing resources at HEIs, and where SND are currently storing data.

One of the first speakers of the day was Sofie Björling, Director of Department of Research Infrastructures at VR. She pointed out that the Swedish Research Council has a responsibility to coordinate the national work with open access to research data. As of now it is unclear exactly which shape this work will take, as it is an area with a lot of stakeholders and overlapping areas of responsibility, but VR is working with SND to sort that out.

We were given a lot of information about SND’s structure with Data Access Units (DAU) and Domain Specialists (DoSp), and got an overview of how far each HEI had made it in developing these. Here in Borås we are waiting for a joint research data coordinator with University West and Skövde University. At the same time we also want to work with these questions locally even before that position has been filled, as there is a lot to be done in this area.

There was also a lot of information about FAIR data, where the most important message is what the acronym Findable, Accessible, Interoperable & Reusable actually means. A PID (persistent identifier) such as a DOI (digital object identifier) is a good way of making your data findable. Making data accessible doesn’t mean not protecting it – just that it has to be accessible in a file format that makes it possible for others (or even yourself) to actually use and reuse it. SND maintain guides with best practices and check lists for how to make data FAIR.

Currently 80% of all research data is said to be ‘re-useless’ – that is a frighteningly high number when you think know how much time, money and work is required to create research data in the first place. To be unable to guarantee that you can reuse or control your own or others’ data after the fact has to be seen as a big problem. One way the EU is tackling this is by requiring all those awarded Horizon 2020 funding to submit a Data Management Plan (DMP) to prevent this kind of information loss.

To end on a positive note, the ICOS Carbon Portal talked about how valuable it has been for them to make their data FAIR, and their repository is a good example of what Open Science can look like.

Program with linked presentations

Day 1: SND och lärosätena – arbetet framåt (program & presentations in Swedish)
Day 2: The Road to FAIR data (program & presentations in English)

Text: Signe Wulund